29
ས་
294
expended
on
repairs of the Traya and
Sea Wall opposite his Lot terminated in
a verdict for the Defendants, which may
be regarded as deciding the
deciding the non liability
of those tenants to bear
any proportion
of such repairs in future.
2
It is true that in his
his charge to the
Juny the Chief Justice allowed, as
appears
from the enclosed printed copy of the
proceedings
Enclosure A.
at the trial, it to be inferred aged 8. that although the conditions in the
Lease
om
which the Attorney General
or construed
relied could not be upset by any aquments or subsequent pard contracts in reference thereto, there might arise out of such transactions, subsequent
original
to the
demise in 1844, an
3.
equitable claim-even of a retrospective
nature on the part of the brown to contribution by the tenants under the
old leaves
13
#
а
for a proportion of the repairs
necesary to the Thaya.
mo
ami me
nevertheless of opinion that
•good deject would be effected by further
proceedings. It
unavoidable that
this Gouemment, as Fructe for the general interests of the Eublic, before throwing
the cost
of
all the
repairs in
question
on the Community at large,
obtain the decision of some
should
competent
Court as to the rights of the Public,
beeing that without buck decision the Excecutive has
power to abandon Public rights, and impose
mo
com
the ginnal
3
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.